CLOSE THE SALEM NUKES
NOW
The UNPLUG SALEM
Campaign
321 Barr Ave.,
Linwood NJ 08221
609-601-8583/601-8537; ncohen12@comcast.net
http://www.unplugsalem.org/
Date:
10/20/03
To:
Nils J. Diaz, Chairman, Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Dear
Chairman Diaz,
On behalf of the 109 organizations that
comprise the UNPLUG Salem Campaign, I am sending you this letter. This letter
is a request to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend issuance of any
license amendment requests at PSEG’s three nuclear plants at Artificial Island:
Salem Units One and Two, and Hope Creek. This halt should stay in place until
an NRC inspection verifies adequate correction of chronic human performance
problems at the Island. This request is due to PSEG’s apparent inability to
change the safety culture at its three plants. This deficiency in safety
culture is indicated by the NRC’s repeated findings of human performance,
problem identification and resolution cross - cutting issues.
A short list of
documents in ADAMS that demonstrate these continuing human performance/safety
culture cross- cutting issues include, but are not limited to: ML022140463,
2002-08-02; ML032240699, 2003-08-12; ML031320802, 2003-05-12; ML030620693,
2003-03-03; ML032390511, 2003-08-27; ML031330793 2003-05-13; ML022140114
2002-08-01; and ML032130232 2003-08-01,
In reality these
human error/safety culture issues have been a challenge unsuccessfully met by
PSEG for many years. In July of 2001,
Dave Lochbaum, nuclear safety engineer for the Union of Concerned Scientists
documented an unusually high number of human error/safety culture errors at the
Hope Creek and Salem Nuclear Plants.
(Lochbaum’s letter is attached to this document.)
At the last four
inspection exit meetings, PSEG has continued to pledge to fix their human error
problems. Even at the re-start hearings for Salem Units One and Two in 1997 and
1998, PSEG acknowledged problems with their safety culture and vowed to fix
them. Clearly, PSEG has not fixed these
problems. PSEG’s promises may be sincere, but their efforts to date have not
yielded tangible improvements in human performance. By refraining from
approving license amendments until PSEG has replaced promises with progress,
the NRC will (a) provide PSEG with the incentives it apparently lacks on its
own to fix this chronic safety problem and (b) remind the public and plant
workers that the NRC cares about their safety.
We feel that this
action is necessary and prudent. Many of the license amendment requests sought
by PSEG reduce the testing and inspection intervals for important safety
equipment at the Island. Obviously, the justification for such reductions is
lacking when there are chronic human performance problems.
This request is
being made in light of the debacles at Davis Besse, in which poor safety
culture was a major contributor to a near-miss Loss Of Cooling Accident, and at
Indian Point, where the NRC allowed Indian Point to continue to operate with
defective steam generators. To avoid another major problem from occurring, it
seems to the UNPLUG Salem Campaign that the NRC must take the extra steps
necessary at all nuclear plants, including the three at Artificial Island, to
make sure that safety culture at these plants is working. Therefore our
suggestion is a quite reasonable one, and one that the NRC should have already
adopted.
The NRC is free to
characterize this letter as a 2.206 petition, if applicable.
Sincerely,
Norm
Cohen
Coordinator,
UNPLUG
Salem Campaign
Attachment 2: salem usc (application/pdf)